Open Access

CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides protect mice from Burkholderia pseudomallei but not Francisella tularensis Schu S4 aerosols

  • David A Rozak1Email author,
  • Herbert C Gelhaus1, 3,
  • Mark Smith2,
  • Mojgan Zadeh1, 4,
  • Louis Huzella2,
  • David Waag1 and
  • Jeffrey J Adamovicz1, 5
Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines20108:2

DOI: 10.1186/1476-8518-8-2

Received: 10 November 2009

Accepted: 5 February 2010

Published: 5 February 2010


Studies have shown that CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODN) protect mice from various bacterial pathogens, including Burkholderia pseudomallei and Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS), when administered before parenteral challenge. Given the potential to develop CpG ODN as a pre-treatment for multiple bacterial biological warfare agents, we examined survival, histopathology, and cytokine data from CpG ODN-treated C57BL/6 mice to determine whether previously-reported protection extended to aerosolized B. pseudomallei 1026b and highly virulent F. tularensis Schu S4 infections. We found that, although CpG ODN protected mice from aerosolized B. pseudomallei challenges, the immunostimulant failed to benefit the animals exposed to F. tularensis Schu S4 aerosols. Our results, which contrast with earlier F. tularensis LVS studies, highlight potential differences in Francisella species pathogenesis and underscore the need to evaluate immunotherapies against human pathogenic species.


Bacteria-derived CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODN) are potent stimulators of the innate immune system, acting via the toll-like receptor (TLR) 9 signaling pathway. Consequently, the small CpG-rich motifs [1] have been successfully developed as adjuvants for a broad array of bacterial subunit vaccines and are currently undergoing multiple clinical trials [2]. CpG ODNs have also been administered alone as pretreatments to effectively protect mice from infection by different bacterial pathogens [3], including the biological warfare threat agents Burkholderia mallei [4] and Burkholderia pseudomallei [5]. Murine studies of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) [3] suggest that CpG ODN may also protect against human-virulent F. tularensis Schu S4 infection. Significantly, researchers have shown that CpG ODNs protect mice from F. tularensis LVS when the therapy is administered anywhere from two days to two weeks before parenteral challenge [3] and can maintain this protection indefinitely when CpG ODN is given two to three times a month [6]. Provided CpG ODNs can broadly protect against different aerosolized biological warfare agents days or weeks after treatment, the molecules may represent potential pretreatments for military or civilian personnel at risk of exposure to the weaponized bacteria.

In order to determine whether CpG ODN protects mice from aerosolized B. pseudomallei 1026b or F. tularensis Schu S4 challenges (all previous reports deal with parenteral challenges), we gave groups of 8-10 anaesthetized 8-week-old female C57BL6/J mice 20 μl i.n. or 200 μl i.p. injections of Hank's basal salt solution (HBSS) 48 h before or 1 h after receiving aerosolized doses of B. pseudomallei 1026b or F. tularensis Schu S4.

Depending on the group, 150 μg CpG ODN 10103 (Coley Pharmaceutical Group: 5'-TCG TCG TTT CGT CGT TTT GTC GTT-3'), which has been developed as a potent stimulant for the human immune system, was added to the saline treatment. CpG ODN variants are known to produce different immunostimulatory responses in different mammalian species [7]. However, our own unpublished studies suggest that CpG ODN 10103 performs comparably in mice to CpG ODN 7909 (5'-TCGTCGTTTTGTCGTTTTGTCGTT-3'), which was previously reported to protect the BALB/c mice from Burkholderia mallei challenges [4]. Despite CpG ODN 10103's traditional use as a human adjuvant, we have found that the immunostimulant's ability to protect mice from aerosolized B. pseudomallei (reported here) and B. mallei (unpublished data) suggest that, as with the CpG motifs used in other Burkholderia and F. tularensis murine studies [36], the oligodeoxyribonucleotide is an effective immunostimulant in both C57BL6/J and BALB/c mice.

We gave saline control and CpG ODN 10103-treated mice different aerosolized doses of B. pseudomallei 1026b or F. tularensis Schu S4 prepared from 37°C overnight glycerol tryptone broth or IsoVitaleX (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD)-supplemented Mueller Hinton broth cultures, respectively. Serial dilutions of nebulizer and impinger medium were prepared in triplicate and spread on solid media to calculate actual inhaled doses. When necessary, mice from each treatment group were split evenly between consecutive aerosol runs to accommodate potential variations in aerosol dose from one run to the next. As indicated in Figure 1, CpG ODN-treated mice were significantly protected from high and low doses of aerosolized B. pseudomallei 1026b challenges (p < 0.05 when compared to saline controls). However this was not the case for F. tularensis Schu S4-infected animals, which were unprotected regardless of challenge dose or treatment route. In fact, our data suggests that CpG ODN 10103 therapies may have adversely affected the survival of F. tularensis-infected mice. Specifically, mice given 150 μg CpG ODN i.n. 48 h prior to challenge actually exhibited a statistically significant (p < 0.025) decrease in survival when compared to controls. Furthermore, when all mice receiving 55 cfu aerosolized F. tularensis Schu S4 are grouped according to whether or not they received CpG ODN, regardless of treatment route and time, the untreated controls exhibited a statistically elevated survival curve (p = 0.05). B. pseudomallei and F. tularensis-infected mice were statistically unaffected by giving the CpG ODN treatments via different routes (i.n. or i.p.) and times (48 h before or 1 h after infection).
Figure 1

CpG ODN 10103 differently protects mice from aerosolized B. pseudomallei 1026b and F. tularensis Schu S4 challenges. Groups of 8-10 C57BL6/J mice were given saline (bold solid lines) or 150 μg CpG ODN 10103 via intranasal (bold dashed lines) or intraperitoneal (thin solid lines) injection 48 h before or 1 h after being challenged with aerosolize B. pseudomallei 1026b or F. tularensis Schu S4 and observed for 14-28 days. The calculated inhaled bacterial doses are given above each graph. Intraperitoneal and 1 h post-challenge therapies were only administered during the low-dose challenges. Survival curves were compared using log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests.

To further explore the bacterial response to CpG ODN treatments, we repeated aerosol challenges for groups of nine mice that had received CpG ODN i.n. treatments 48 h before infection. Each of the mice received average inhaled doses of 236 cfu of B. pseudomallei 1026b or 3,100 cfu of Francisella Schu S4. Three mice from each experimental group were euthanized 1, 3, and 6 days post infection to observe disease progression in lungs, livers, and spleens. In a qualitative review of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained, paraffin-embedded tissues, CpG ODN-treated mice exhibited elevated levels of hepatitis and interstitial pneumonia at all time points compared to untreated mice, regardless of whether or not they were challenged with B. pseudomallei1026b or F. tularensis Schu S4. The latter observation is consistent with CpG ODN-induced lung inflammation previously reported for uninfected mice [8]. Whereas CpG ODN treatment prevented bronchopneumonia, pulmonary abscesses, liver necrosis, and splenic thrombi in B. pseudomallei 1026b-infected mice 3 and 6 days postinfection, the development of pulmonary abscesses and hepatic and splenic necrosis in F. tularensis Schu S4-challenged mice remained unaffected by CpG ODN treatment. Six days postinfection, B. pseudomallei and F. tularensis infections of untreated mice were typified by bronchopneumonia and thrombosis in the former and interstitial pneumonia, hepatitis, and splenic necrosis in the latter (Figure 2).
Figure 2

CpG ODN 10103 administered intranasally 48 h prior to infection differently effects B. pseudomallei 1026b and F. tularensis Schu S4 pathogenesis in aerosol-challenged mice. At 6 days post infection, mice challenged with B. pseudomallei developed bronchopneumonia and pulmonary abscesses (A: arrowheads) and areas of liver necrosis (B: arrows). By contrast, B. pseudomallei-infected mice pretreated with CpG ODN developed only mild interstitial pneumonia (C) and lymphoplasmacytic hepatitis (D: arrows). F. tularensis-challenged mice exhibited bronchopneumonia and pulmonary abscesses (E, G: arrows) and areas of liver necrosis (F, H: arrows) 6 days after infection regardless of whether or not they received CpG ODN. Cytokine levels in the livers and lungs of saline (red circles)- and CpG ODN (blue squares)-treated mice differed significantly for mice infected with B. pseudomallei but not F. tularensis. Mean cytokine levels for tissues obtained from mice 1, 3, and 6 days after infection are rendered as colored bars. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between saline- and CpG ODN-treated groups on day 6. Parenthetical values accompanying cytokine labels indicate numbers of independent data points obtained for saline- and CpG ODN-treated mice. Cytokine concentrations below 1 pg/ml fall below the x-axis and are not shown on the graphs. T-tests were used to support qualitative analysis of CBA-generated cytokine data.

Tissue samples from the same mice were also ground and diluted 10-fold by mass into 25 mM pH 7.0 potassium phosphate buffer before aliquots were sampled using the BD Cytokine Bead Array (CBA) Mouse Inflammation kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cytokine levels in the livers, lungs, and spleens of mice euthanized on days 1, 3, and 6 postinfection correlated well with the B. pseudomallei- and F. tularensis-induced pathogenesis observed in the same tissue samples (Figure 2). Whereas interleukin (IL)-6, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, interferon (IFN)-γ, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) were statistically elevated in the hepatic tissue of untreated B. pseudomallei-infected mice, the cytokines dropped to basal levels in the lungs and livers of similarly infected CpG ODN-treated mice, which generally lacked culturable bacteria at 6 days postinfection. Conversely, 6 days after infection, cytokine levels were dramatically elevated in the lungs, livers, and spleens of F. tularensis-challenged mice, regardless of whether or not they received CpG ODN treatments. Elevated cytokine levels in the lungs and spleens of F. tularensis-infected animals 6 days postinfection correlated well with the recruitment of immune cells to the interstitial lung tissue and acute necrosis of the spleen observed by histopathology.

The novel aerosol data presented here corroborate previous reports of CpG ODN-mediated protection for B. pseudomallei-infected BALB/c mice with novel data for low- and high-dose aerosolized challenges of C57BL6/J mice. However, the results of our F. tularensis Schu S4 experiments contrast with earlier accounts of the protection offered by CpG ODN treatments for C57BL6/J mice challenged with the less virulent F. tularensis LVS. The independent survival and histopathology experiments presented in Figures 1 and 2 reveal that CpG ODN 10103 failed to positively affect the course of F. tularensis Schu S4 pneumonic infection and statistically reduced the survival rates for CpG ODN-treated mice exposed to low-dose F. tularensis Schu S4 aerosols.

Differing responses to immunostimulatory treatments have already been reported among Francisella species and appear to be consistent with the potentially adverse effects observed here for F. tularensis Schu S4, which is known to actively impair host immune response [9, 10]. Specifically, Kieffer et al reported that mice treated with either F. tularensis LVS- or F. novicida U112-derived lipopolysaccaride (LPS) 3-5 days before bacterial challenge were protected from F. tularensis LVS, but not F. novicida U112, infections [11]. In fact, the group observed that their LPS therapies may have actually enhanced the virulence F. novicida, which is more closely related by genome analysis [12, 13] and murine virulence models [11] to F. tularensis type A strains than type B. Therefore, while our findings regarding F. tularensis Schu S4 infection in CpG ODN-treated mice are novel, they are not entirely unexpected in the context of Francisella research and further underscore the need for immunotherapeutic studies in both A and B subtypes.

Finally, we would like to assert that all research was conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and experiments involving animals and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, 1996. The facility where this research was conducted is fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.



cytokine bead array


colony forming unit


Hank's basal saline solution








live vaccine strain


monocyte chemotactic protein


modified Thayer-Martin agar




Toll-like receptor


tumor necrosis factor.



The research described herein was sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Department of Defense, project number ZZ0001_06_RD_B. This project was supported in part by appointments to the Internship/Research Participation Program for the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the USAMRMC. We thank Sarah Norris for her support with the statistical analysis. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Army.

Authors’ Affiliations

Bacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
Pathology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Battelle Memorial Institute
Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
Center for Biological Safety and Security, Midwest Research Institute


  1. Krieg AM, Yi AK, Matson S, Waldschmidt TJ, Bishop GA, Teasdale R, Koretzky GA, Klinman DM: CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature. 1995, 374 (6522): 546-549. 10.1038/374546a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vollmer J: Progress in drug development of immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotide ligands for TLR9. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2005, 5 (5): 673-682. 10.1517/14712598.5.5.673.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Elkins KL, Rhinehart-Jones TR, Stibitz S, Conover JS, Klinman DM: Bacterial DNA containing CpG motifs stimulates lymphocyte-dependent protection of mice against lethal infection with intracellular bacteria. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (4): 2291-2298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Waag DM, McCluskie MJ, Zhang N, Krieg AM: A CpG oligonucleotide can protect mice from a low aerosol challenge dose of Burkholderia mallei. Infection and immunity. 2006, 74 (3): 1944-1948. 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1944-1948.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wongratanacheewin S, Kespichayawattana W, Intachote P, Pichyangkul S, Sermswan RW, Krieg AM, Sirisinha S: Immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotide confers protection in a murine model of infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infection and immunity. 2004, 72 (8): 4494-4502. 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4494-4502.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Klinman DM, Conover J, Coban C: Repeated administration of synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides expressing CpG motifs provides long-term protection against bacterial infection. Infection and immunity. 1999, 67 (11): 5658-5663.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Krieg AM: The role of CpG motifs in innate immunity. Current opinion in immunology. 2000, 12 (1): 35-43. 10.1016/S0952-7915(99)00048-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schwartz DA, Quinn TJ, Thorne PS, Sayeed S, Yi AK, Krieg AM: CpG motifs in bacterial DNA cause inflammation in the lower respiratory tract. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1997, 100 (1): 68-73. 10.1172/JCI119523.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosio CM, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Belisle JT: Active suppression of the pulmonary immune response by Francisella tularensis Schu4. J Immunol. 2007, 178 (7): 4538-4547.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase JC, Celli J, Bosio CM: Direct and indirect impairment of human dendritic cell function by virulent Francisella tularensis Schu S4. Infection and immunity. 2009, 77 (1): 180-195. 10.1128/IAI.00879-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kieffer TL, Cowley S, Nano FE, Elkins KL: Francisella novicida LPS has greater immunobiological activity in mice than F. tularensis LPS, and contributes to F. novicida murine pathogenesis. Microbes and infection/Institut Pasteur. 2003, 5 (5): 397-403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsman M, Sandstrom G, Sjostedt A: Analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of Francisella strains and utilization for determination of the phylogeny of the genus and for identification of strains by PCR. International journal of systematic bacteriology. 1994, 44 (1): 38-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hollis DG, Weaver RE, Steigerwalt AG, Wenger JD, Moss CW, Brenner DJ: Francisella philomiragia comb. nov. (formerly Yersinia philomiragia) and Francisella tularensis biogroup novicida (formerly Francisella novicida) associated with human disease. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1989, 27 (7): 1601-1608.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar


© Rozak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.