Probing local innate immune responses after mucosal immunisation
© Hall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 1 April 2010
Accepted: 13 September 2010
Published: 13 September 2010
Intranasal immunisation is potentially a very effective route for inducing both mucosal and systemic immunity to an infectious agent.
Balb/c mice were intranasally immunised with the mucosal adjuvant heat labile toxin and the Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein Ag85B-ESAT6 and early changes in innate immune responses within local mucosal tissues were examined using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were also evaluated.
Intranasal immunisation induced significant changes in both number and distribution of dendritic cells, macrophages and neutrophils within the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue and cervical lymph nodes in comparison to controls as early as 5 h post immunisation. Immunisation also resulted in a rapid and transient increase in activation marker expression first in the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue, and then in the cervical lymph nodes. This heightened activation status was also apparent from the pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles of these innate populations. In addition we also showed increased expression and distribution of a number of different cell adhesion molecules early after intranasal immunisation within these lymphoid tissues. These observed early changes correlated with the induction of a TH1 type immune response.
These data provide insights into the complex nature of innate immune responses induced following intranasal immunisation within the upper respiratory tract, and may help clarify the concepts and provide the tools that are needed to exploit the full potential of mucosal vaccines.
In recent years the nasal route for vaccination has emerged as an attractive mucosal route for inducing both local and systemic immunity and offers some important opportunities for the prophylaxis of many diseases. In addition to the generation of strong local mucosal immune responses within the respiratory tract, the nose can also act as an ideal inductive and effector site for immune responses at distal mucosal sites such as the lung, gut and vagina via the common mucosal immune system [1–3] The rational design of nasal vaccines for clinical use depends on the availability of information about the mechanisms that lead to a mucosal immune response after i.n. vaccination . Unfortunately, despite its role in mucosal immunity, little is known about the immune system within the upper respiratory tract (URT).
The role of lymphoid tissues in respiratory tract defences includes antigen uptake, processing and consequent presentation for the induction of mucosal immune responses. In rodents this has been found to occur in the secondary organised lymphoid aggregate, called the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), located at the floor of the nasal cavity [1, 5, 6]. The NALT is the first point of contact for many inhaled antigens, and consequently plays a major role in both induction and effector immune responses, which are then further amplified in the draining cervical lymph nodes (CLN) . In humans, the nasopharyngeal region also contains a high density of immune competent cells similar to the NALT, most notable in the Waldeyer's ring which consists of the tonsils and adenoids .
In addition to the generation of adaptive immune responses, the induction of innate immunity is also crucial for vaccines to elicit potent antigen specific immune responses. However, despite i.n. immunisation emerging as one of the most promising mucosal routes for vaccine delivery, few studies have examined the innate immune populations recruited and consequently induced within the URT early after i.n. administration of antigen. The majority of studies looking at the NALT and CLN have focussed on the induction of antigen-specific T and B lymphocytes, and have therefore tended to examine later time-points [6, 9–11] A greater understanding of innate immune processes, conducted by cells relatively unrestricted in antigen specificity, including, DC, MФ and neutrophils (PMN) is therefore required.
The impact of immunisation on the expression of mucosal homing receptors on circulating immune cells, as well as mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) expression on endothelium, has been rather well studied, particularly with regards to the gut [12, 13]. Oral (intestinal) mucosal exposure to antigen seems to stimulate expression of α4β7 integrins, which together with MAdCAM-1 mediates leukocyte homing [14, 15]. Previous studies have shown that within both the NALT and CLN, high endothelial venules (HEVs) utilise peripheral node adressin (PNAd)-L-selectin interactions and MAdCAM-1-α4β7 interactions for leukocyte binding, although not all HEV express MAdCAM-1 [15, 16]. However, as yet, it is still unknown whether this homing of specific cells is mediated by altered cell adhesion molecule (CAM) expression after i.n. vaccination in the URT lymphoid tissues.
As already mentioned, stimulation of the innate immune system is known to have an important role in the progression of adaptive immunity. Thus, inclusion of molecules, such as adjuvants, which can trigger early innate immune responses involved in the generation of strong and protective adaptive immune responses, is crucial to vaccine effectiveness. This is why we have included Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) as a model for a strong mucosal adjuvant in our study. LT is a well characterised adjuvant which is known to induce strong immune responses after contact with mucosal surfaces when co-administered with soluble antigens . In addition to LT, we also employed the use of the M. tuberculosis fusion antigen, Ag85B-ESAT6. This particular protein has been used in numerous reports and has been shown to induce strong immune responses and importantly has already been used in several recent i.n. immunisation studies [18–20]. Thus the aim of this work is to contribute to our understanding of innate immune responses induced within both the NALT and CLN early after i.n. administration of antigen and the corresponding adaptive responses that these changes provoke.
Female Balb/c mice (5-6 weeks) from Charles River, UK were used in all animal experiments. All animals were given food and water ad libitum. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation or exsanguination. Animal husbandry and experimental procedures were conducted according to the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.
For immunisations, mice were lightly anesthetised and then i.n. immunised on day 0 with 10 μg Ag85B-ESAT6 plus 1 μg LT, or PBS (naïve mice) in a volume of 15 μL/nostril. The adjuvant LT was a kind gift from Novartis, Italy and purified Ag85B-ESAT6 was obtained from the Statens Serum Institute, Denmark.
Antibodies used in study.
PE-Cy7 or none
PE or none
PE or FITC
DC and MФ
I-Ab (MHC II)
DC and MФ
Alexa Fluor 647
DC, MФ and PMN
Alexa Fluor 700
DC, MФ and PMN
DC, MФ and PMN
Alexa Fluor 488 or 568
Alexa Fluor 488 or 568
Single cell suspensions from the NALT and CLN of individual mice were prepared to obtain a final concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well in blocking buffer (1 × PBS/1% BSA/0.05% sodium azide/1% rat, hamster and mouse serum). To this; 50 μL of each mAb dye mix was added plus 5 μL of the amine-reactive viability dye ViViD (Invitrogen) to determine dead cells, with incubation in the dark at 4°C for 30 min . The mAb used for flow cytometry are listed in Table 1. Cells were washed twice with blocking buffer and finally resuspended in 200 μL 1% paraformaldehyde. To perform flow cytometric analyses and measure relative fluorescence intensities a FACSAria cytometer and BD Diva software (Becton Dickinson) were used. For each mouse 20,000-200,000 events were recorded. The percentage of cells labelled with each mAb was calculated in comparison with cells stained with isotype control antibody. Background staining was controlled by labelled isotype controls (BD Biosciences, Invitrogen and AbD Serotec) and fluorescence-minus-one (FMO). The results represent the percentage of positively stained cells in the total cell population exceeding the background staining signal. For determination of intracellular cytokine production, cells were incubated for 6 h at 37°C with BD Activation Cocktail plus GolgiPlug or GolgiPlug alone (BD Biosciences). Cells were then washed with staining buffer and stained at 4°C with appropriate surface mAb listed in Table 1. Cells were then fixed and saponin-permeabilised (Perm/Fix solution, BD Biosciences) and incubated with cytokine mAb listed in Table 1 or isotypic controls. After 30 min cells were twice washed in permealisation buffer (BD Biosciences) and then analysed by flow cytometry as described above.
Evaluation of antibody responses
Serum samples from mice were obtained on day 28 post immunisation and analysed for the presence of total Ig, IgG1 and IgG2a. Briefly, ELISA plates (Nunc Maxisorp) were coated overnight at 4°C with 50 μL of a 2 μg/mL solution of purified Ag85B-ESAT6 in coating buffer (0.1 M Na2HPO4 at a pH of 9) and then blocked with 3.0% BSA at room temperature for 1 h. Serum samples were diluted in 0.1% BSA starting at 1:100. Each plate contained control wells with preimmune sera, PBS (pH 7.4), or a known positive immune serum and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Antibodies conjugated to HRP were diluted 1:1000 and plates incubated for a further 30 min at 37°C. The level of HRP associated with each well was then determined using Sigma Fast o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (50 μL per well) colorimetric substrate. The reaction was stopped after 15 min by the addition of 2.5 M H2SO4. The OD490 was determined, and the titre was expressed as the reciprocal of the dilution giving an OD of 0.2.
Lung and nasal lavages, performed post-mortem, were used to measure mucosal antibody responses. Lavages were performed using 1 mL of ice-cold PBS containing a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Roche), which was flushed in and out of the lungs and nasal passages with a fine-tipped Pasteur pipette inserted via the trachea. The ELISA protocol was modified as follows; lavage fluid was diluted in 0.1% BSA starting at 1:10. IgA conjugated to biotin (BD Biosciences) was used as the secondary antibody at 1:1000. To detect the biotin-conjugated antibody, 50 μL of streptavidin-HRP diluted at 1:1000 was added to each well. Plates were developed and titres measured as described above.
Cytometric Bead Array cytokine analysis
Spleens were removed from mice 28 days post immunisation and seeded, in duplicate at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well. Splenocytes were stimulated with either Ag85B-ESAT6 or Concanavalin A (both at 5 μg/mL) or RPMI+ medium. Plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 36-48 h. Cytokines IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were analysed using cytometric bead analysis flexi-kits (BD Biosciences) and assays were performed per the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were then analysed on a FACSAria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The limit of detection was ~ 8 pg/mL for all cytokines.
Experimental results were plotted and analysed with Prism4 software (GraphPad Software Inc, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined by using the Mann-Whitney U test or by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test compared to naïve mice (i.e. 0 h).
i.n. immunisation induces significant changes in the percentage and total cell number of innate cell populations within both the NALT and CLN
Percentages of innate populations within the NALT and CLN after i.n. immunisation.
6.5 ± 0.6
5.4 ± 0.5
7.8 ± 0.8*
6.7 ± 0.5
7.6 ± 0.8
4.9 ± 0.4***
7.6 ± 0.9
7.9 ± 1.1
6.9 ± 1.1
4.9 ± 0.4**
5.9 ± 0.8
8.0 ± 1.2
4.1 ± 0.3
4.3 ± 0.3
2.4 ± 0.2***
5.5 ± 0.6***
3.6 ± 0.3
3.2 ± 0.2
3.7 ± 0.4
6.7 ± 0.7***
3.5 ± 0.3
5.5 ± 0.9***
3.2 ± 0.3
2.1 ± 0.2**
Kinetic analysis revealed that i.n. immunisation differentially influenced several cell populations during early time-points, and significant changes in percentage and relative cell number were evident as early as 5 h post immunisation (Fig. 1 and Table 2). For example, percentages and numbers of NALT DC (defined as CD11c+), MФ (F4/80+) and PMN (as Ly6G+), were significantly (p < 0.01) diminished 5 h post immunisation. However, we then observed a steady and significant (p < 0.001) increase in NALT innate cells from 24 h up until 72 h post immunisation. The percentage of CLN PMN was increased 5 h post immunisation, with a subsequent reduction apparent 72 h post immunisation (Table 2). As observed in the NALT, total MФ numbers were also significantly (p < 0.01) increased in the CLN of immunised mice from 24 h. After an initial decrease in CLN DC population at 24 h, this was followed by an impressive increase (over 2 times) when compared to naïve mice (Fig. 1B).
Innate populations are activated shortly after i.n. immunisation within both lymphoid tissues
Innate immune populations secrete a range of cytokines shortly after i.n. immunisation
Distribution of innate cellular populations within NALT and CLN after i.n. immunisation
CAM expression and distribution at early time-points within the NALT and CLN after i.n. immunisation
After i.n. immunisation, we visually observed a greater intensity of MAdCAM-1 expression, which was mainly located on the vascular endothelium of HEVs, and was higher than that seen in naïve animals in both the NALT and CLN at all time-points (Fig. 5A). In addition to venular endothelium, MAdCAM-1 was also shown on the surface of infiltrating cells in the inflamed NALT after only 5 h. All immunised mice were found to have some degree of diffuse MAdCAM-1 staining at all time-points tested within the CLN. Within both tissues we observed an increase in both PNAd expression and the number of HEVs expressing this CAM as early as 5 h post i.n. immunisation (Fig. 5B). This expression profile was still present at 24 h, although by 72 h expression levels of PNAd appeared to have reduced back to those observed in naïve animals. Greater expression of ICAM-1 was observed on HEVs, micro-vessels, and with extension to many cell surfaces within the NALT and CLN of immunised mice at all time-points when compared to naïve tissues (Fig. 5C). As with ICAM-1 expression, VCAM-1 was also observed to be more intense and widespread on HEVs, blood vessels and cells in the NALT of immunised mice (Fig. 5D). Immunisation also increased VCAM-1 expression and distribution in CLN, especially at 24 h. Expression of this CAM was also more widely distributed at 72 h within the CLN, but expression appeared lower than that observed at the 24 h time-point.
Adaptive immune responses are induced following i.n. immunisation
The innate immune response reacts rapidly to foreign antigens with activation and migration of its cellular components [23, 24]. The relevance of these individual components to host survival against pathogen infections is beyond doubt, with the protective contribution of DC, MФ, and PMN, as well as secretion of various cytokines being demonstrated in many infections [25–27]. This has lead to an appreciation in recent years that innate immunity is central to protection against infectious diseases and the induction of adaptive immune responses. However, an integrated picture of innate responses induced after mucosal vaccination has not been established. This current study goes some way to addressing this by characterising changes in defined cell populations and CAM expression in the first few hours and days following i.n. immunisation with a mucosal adjuvant and model antigen and the subsequent adaptive response generated. Hopefully this study will accentuate the importance of understanding the nature of innate immune responses at the mucosae for the design of improved vaccines.
Another aim of this study was to examine the expression of a number of different CAM within both lymphoid tissues early after i.n. immunisation. We have shown that CAM expression of MAdCAM-1, PNAd, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is both increased, and more widely distributed, at all examined time-points in both the NALT and CLN of immunised mice. It has previously been demonstrated that both NALT and CLN express all these CAMs on their HEVs [14, 15, 35]. We also observed expression of these addressins on HEVs in naïve mice and in addition, we found that as early as 5 h post i.n. immunisation, expression of MAdCAM-1 and PNAd was further up regulated on HEVs in both tissues. This increased expression is similar to that observed in other studies after either oral immunisation or challenge in the gut mucosa [13, 36–38]. It is likely that the increased MAdCAM-1 and PNAd expression in the respiratory mucosa after immunisation, possibly due to the increased local production of pro-inflammatory cytokines via innate cells, is one of the mechanisms controlling the recruitment of leukocytes to the site of inflammation . We also observed that ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression was dramatically induced, following i.n. immunisation, on both vascular endothelium and cell surfaces indicating that leukocyte trafficking to the NALT and CLN may also depend on the interactions of αLβ2 and α4β1 cells. It is interesting to note that these same molecules are involved in trafficking in the genito-urinary tract, which may explain why high levels of antigen-specific immune responses are induced in the genital tract after nasal immunisation . As already discussed, VCAM-1 is essential for binding of follicular DC to B cells and for the consequent formation of germinal centres. Additionally, along with ICAM-1, these molecules enable binding to T cells to form part of the stable T cell-APC immunological synapse, which is essential for antigen presentation [40–42]. The increased expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 on the surface of leukocytes indicates a possible role in early recruitment and retention of immune cells, enabling increased antigen presentation, and the consequent induction of antigen specific antibody and cytokine immune responses we observed.
From our data it appears that specific stimulation of innate responses, through administration of adjuvant and antigen i.n., enables conditioning of the immune system for subsequent development of specific TH1 adaptive immunity. These findings may consequently help in the design and construction, via specific targeting of innate populations, of new vaccines against diseases that require this type of immune response for protection. It is hoped that this current research will ultimately provide researchers with a clearer and more informed platform for studying basic immune mechanisms, and may help provide the tools required to exploit the full potential of mucosal vaccines.
This study was carried out with financial support from the Commission of the European Communities, Sixth Framework Programme, contract LSHP-CT-2003-503240, Mucosal Vaccines for Poverty-Related Diseases (MUVAPRED) and The Wellcome Trust. We would also like to thank Novartis, Italy and Statens Serum Institute, Denmark for their kind gifts of purified LT and Ag85B-ESAT6.
- Davis SS: Nasal Vaccines. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2001, 51: 21-42. 10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00162-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu HY, Russell MW: Nasal lymphoid tissue, intranasal immunization, and compartmentalization of the common mucosal immune system. Immunol Res. 1997, 16 (2): 187-201. 10.1007/BF02786362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ouhara K, Komatsuzawa H, Shiba H, Uchida Y, Kawai T, Sayama K, Hashimoto K, Taubman MA, Kurihara H, Sugai M: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans outer membrane protein 100 triggers innate immunity and production of beta-defensin and the 18-kilodalton cationic antimicrobial protein through the fibronectin-integrin pathway in human gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (9): 5211-5220. 10.1128/IAI.00056-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogra PL, Faden H, Welliver RC: Vaccination strategies for mucosal immune responses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001, 14 (2): 430-445. 10.1128/CMR.14.2.430-445.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiyono H, Fukuyama S: NALT-versus Peyer's-patch-mediated mucosal immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004, 4 (9): 699-710. 10.1038/nri1439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuercher AW, Coffin SE, Thurnheer MC, Fundova P, Cebra JJ: Nasal-associated lymphoid tissue is a mucosal inductive site for virus-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. J Immunol. 2002, 168 (4): 1796-1803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bienenstock J, McDermott MR: Bronchus- and nasal-associated lymphoid tissues. Immunol Rev. 2005, 206: 22-31. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00299.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perry M, Whyte A: Immunology of the tonsils. Immunol Today. 1998, 19 (9): 414-421. 10.1016/S0167-5699(98)01307-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medaglini D, Ciabattini A, Cuppone AM, Costa C, Ricci S, Costalonga M, Pozzi G: In vivo activation of naïve CD4+ T cells in nasal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue following intranasal immunization with recombinant Streptococcus gordonii. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (5): 2760-2766. 10.1128/IAI.74.5.2760-2766.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurono Y, Yamamoto M, Fujihashi K, Kodama S, Suzuki M, Mogi G, McGhee JR, Kiyono H: Nasal immunization induces Haemophilus influenzae-specific Th1 and Th2 responses with mucosal IgA and systemic IgG antibodies for protective immunity. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180 (1): 122-132. 10.1086/314827.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiley JA, Hogan RJ, Woodland DL, Harmsen AG: Antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells persist in the upper respiratory tract following influenza virus infection. J Immunol. 2001, 167 (6): 3293-3299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kantele A, Zivny J, Hakkinen M, Elson CO, Mestecky J: Differential homing commitments of antigen-specific T cells after oral or parenteral immunization in humans. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (9): 5173-5177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindholm C, Naylor A, Johansson EL, Quiding-Jarbrink M: Mucosal vaccination increases endothelial expression of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 in the human gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun. 2004, 72 (2): 1004-1009. 10.1128/IAI.72.2.1004-1009.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Csencsits KL, Jutila MA, Pascual DW: Nasal-associated lymphoid tissue: Phenotypic and functional evidence for the primary role of peripheral node addressin in naïve lymphocyte adhesion to high endothelial venules in a mucosal site. J Immunol. 1999, 163 (3): 1382-1389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Csencsits KL, Jutila MA, Pascual DW: Mucosal addressin expression and binding-interactions with naïve lymphocytes vary among the cranial, oral, and nasal-associated lymphoid tissues. Eur J Immunol. 2002, 32 (11): 3029-3039. 10.1002/1521-4141(200211)32:11<3029::AID-IMMU3029>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolvers DA, Coenen-de Roo CJ, Mebius RE, van der Cammen MJ, Tirion F, Miltenburg AM, Kraal G: Intranasally induced immunological tolerance is determined by characteristics of the draining lymph nodes: studies with OVA and human cartilage gp-39. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (4): 1994-1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freytag LC, Clements JD: Mucosal adjuvants. Vaccine. 2005, 23 (15): 1804-1813. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hou Y, Hu WG, Hirano T, Gu XX: A new intra-NALT route elicits mucosal and systemic immunity against Moraxella catarrhalis in a mouse challenge model. Vaccine. 2002, 20 (17-18): 2375-2381. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00097-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dietrich J, Andersen C, Rappuoli R, Doherty TM, Jensen CG, Andersen P: Mucosal administration of Ag85B-ESAT-6 protects against infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and boosts prior bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunity. J Immunol. 2006, 177 (9): 6353-6360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen CS, Dietrich J, Agger EM, Lycke NY, Lovgren K, Andersen P: The Combined CTA1-DD/ISCOMs Vector Is an Effective Intranasal Adjuvant for Boosting Prior Mycobacterium bovis BCG Immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (1): 408-416. 10.1128/IAI.01290-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asanuma H, Thompson AH, Iwasaki T, Sato Y, Inaba Y, Aizawa C, Kurata T, Tamura SI: Isolation and characterization of mouse nasal-associated lymphoid tissue. J Immunol Methods. 1997, 202 (2): 123-131. 10.1016/S0022-1759(96)00243-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Lamoreaux L, Nguyen R, Ambrozak D, Koup RA, Roederer M: Amine reactive dyes: an effective tool to discriminate live and dead cells in polychromatic flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2006, 313 (1-2): 199-208. 10.1016/j.jim.2006.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janeway CA, Medzhitov R: Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002, 20: 197-216. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medzhitov R, Janeway C: Innate immunity. N Engl J Med. 2000, 343 (5): 338-344. 10.1056/NEJM200008033430506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedrosa J, Saunders BM, Appelberg R, Orme IM, Silva MT, Cooper AM: Neutrophils play a protective nonphagocytic role in systemic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of mice. Infect Immun. 2000, 68 (2): 577-583. 10.1128/IAI.68.2.577-583.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samsom JN, Annema A, Groeneveld PH, van Rooijen N, Langermans JA, van Furth R: Elimination of resident macrophages from the livers and spleens of immune mice impairs acquired resistance against a secondary Listeria monocytogenes infection. Infect Immun. 1997, 65 (3): 986-993.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weissman D, Fauci AS: Role of dendritic cells in immunopathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997, 10 (2): 358-367.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuper CF, Koornstra PJ, Hameleers DMH, Biewenga J, Spit BJ, Duijvestijn AM, Vriesman P, Sminia T: The Role of Nasopharyngeal Lymphoid-Tissue. Immunol Today. 1992, 13 (6): 219-224. 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90158-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hiroi T, Iwatani K, Iijima H, Kodama S, Yanagita M, Kiyono H: Nasal immune system: distinctive Th0 and Th1/Th2 type environments in murine nasal-associated lymphoid tissues and nasal passage, respectively. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28 (10): 3346-3353. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199810)28:10<3346::AID-IMMU3346>3.0.CO;2-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu HY, Nikolova EB, Beagley KW, Russell MW: Induction of antibody-secreting cells and T-helper and memory cells in murine nasal lymphoid tissue. Immunology. 1996, 88 (4): 493-500. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.d01-690.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petrovska L, Lopes L, Simmons CP, Pizza M, Dougan G, Chain BM: Modulation of dendritic cell endocytosis and antigen processing pathways by Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin and mutant derivatives. Vaccine. 2003, 21 (13-14): 1445-1454. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00696-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin M, Sharpe A, Clements JD, Michalek SM: Role of B7 costimulatory molecules in the adjuvant activity of the heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli. J Immunol. 2002, 169 (4): 1744-1752.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gueirard P, Ave P, Balazuc AM, Thiberge S, Huerre M, Milon G, Guiso N: Bordetella bronchiseptica persists in the nasal cavities of mice and triggers early delivery of dendritic cells in the lymph nodes draining the lower and upper respiratory tract. Infect Immun. 2003, 71 (7): 4137-4143. 10.1128/IAI.71.7.4137-4143.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soriani M, Bailey L, Hirst TR: Contribution of the ADP-ribosylating and receptor-binding properties of cholera-like enterotoxins in modulating cytokine secretion by human intestinal epithelial cells. Microbiology (Reading, England). 2002, 148 (Pt 3): 667-676.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hussain I, Randolph D, Brody SL, Song SK, Hsu A, Kahn AM, Chaplin DD, Hamilos DL: Induction, distribution and modulation of upper airway allergic inflammation in mice. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001, 31 (7): 1048-1059. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01129.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quiding-Jarbrink M, Nordstrom I, Granstrom G, Kilander A, Jertborn M, Butcher EC, Lazarovits AI, Holmgren J, Czerkinsky C: Differential expression of tissue-specific adhesion molecules on human circulating antibody-forming cells after systemic, enteric, and nasal immunizations. A molecular basis for the compartmentalization of effector B cell responses. J Clin Invest. 1997, 99 (6): 1281-1286. 10.1172/JCI119286.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rydstrom A, Wick MJ: Monocyte Recruitment, Activation, and Function in the Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue during Oral Salmonella Infection. J Immunol. 2007, 178 (9): 5789-5801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salmi M, Granfors K, MacDermott R, Jalkanen S: Aberrant binding of lamina propria lymphocytes to vascular endothelium in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 1994, 106 (3): 596-605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perry LL, Feilzer K, Portis JL, Caldwell HD: Distinct homing pathways direct T lymphocytes to the genital and intestinal mucosae in Chlamydia-infected mice. J Immunol. 1998, 160 (6): 2905-2914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrasco YR, Fleire SJ, Cameron T, Dustin ML, Batista FD: LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction lowers the threshold of B cell activation by facilitating B cell adhesion and synapse formation. Immunity. 2004, 20 (5): 589-599. 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00105-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balogh P, Aydar Y, Tew JG, Szakal AK: Appearance and phenotype of murine follicular dendritic cells expressing VCAM-1. Anat Rec. 2002, 268 (2): 160-168. 10.1002/ar.10148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dustin ML, Shaw AS: Costimulation: building an immunological synapse. Science. 1999, 283 (5402): 649-650. 10.1126/science.283.5402.649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.